Objective What?

Tell it, don't embellish it.

Kev Needham | 2005-08-30

In case you missed it, bad things have happened down in the southern United States over the last twenty-four hours. I doubt you have missed it, however, as all of the TV news channels/groups (no, I will not link to them) have been covering it. You’ll notice I say covering, because what I’ve seen so far hasn’t been reporting; it’s been more along the lines of asking leading questions and highlighting visceral details to “sell” the news instead of report it.

It’s upsetting, and I’d like to offer some recommendations—which I know no one would ever follow— that I wish were in place:

Everything that’s happened in the wake of hurricane Katrina along the gulf coast has been sobering and depressing. The commercial media outlets down here have, as usual, used it to sell more spots. I’m not naiive enough to be surprised by their behaviour, but it’s times like these that I really miss the good ‘ole days of objective reporting.

TV sucks.

Kev Needham

August 30, 2005
OOØOOOODCCXIX

3 Responses to “Objective What?”

  1. boyfaceddog Says:

    “We did not feel it so necessary to assume an objective tone in our reporting then. We were more honest and straightforward and did not make such a sanctimonious thing of objectivity, which is finally a way of constructing an opinion for the reader without letting him know that you are.”

    E.L Doctorow - “The Waterworks”

    Something to think on.

  2. weeble Says:

    “Never let the facts get in the way of a good story.” It’s a shame but now the norm in the ‘news’.

  3. kev Says:

    Heh - I agree that some editorialising will always be imparted on stories as they are told, and found that as the week wore on, it moved from the sensationalistic to “this is an embarassment”. My biggest complaint remains with the fact that they stick to their commercial advertisement scheduling like glue. Informative interviews would get cut short on the mark, because it was time for the ad. I understand the ads pay a percentage of the costs and have a decent margin, but sometimes it makes me shake my head.

    I was happy to see field reporters start asking why their anchor’s continued to ask incredibly stupid questions, and also to see some folks in the media finally start questioning the effectiveness of their administration. About fucking time.

    Still, it’s depressing to see the Ken and Barbie anchors affix their plastic smiles and spout off the same trite remarks about the “devastation” over and over. It’s also saddening to see networks like NBC censor people’s opinions because they deviated from a script and let their feelings show.

    Ah well, it won’t change a whole lot, but maybe folks will feel a little more comfortable asking some hard questions of their gummint from now on. Here’s hoping.

Leave a Reply

pintday.org » Fresh Every Tuesday.